| NEWS | | |  | | | LETTERS | | |
|
|
|
Haystack "castle" must be pulled down
A MAN who hid a house behind a haystack in an effort to avoid planning laws has been ordered to tear it down.
A planning inspector ruled that Robert Fidler, who built the castle-style home on his land at Honeycrock Farm, Salfords, should demolish it within 12 months.
Mr Fidler, 59, secretly built the house without planning permission in 2001, concealing it behind hay bales for five years.
He hoped to take advantage of a legal loophole which allows developments to remain if there are no objections within four years.
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council served an enforcement notice on the property last year along with eleven others relating to unauthorised developments and activities on the farm in Axes Lane, inlcuding a race track, a marquee and a conservatory extension. All are on Green Belt land - a rural area protected from development.
Mr Fidler appealed and an inquiry was opened in January.
Two of his appeals were successful. The conversion of a large barn into industrial units was allowed along with a limited range of uses in the building.
Council leader Lynne Hack said: "We're pleased that deception has not been rewarded and that our green belt has been protected.
"Clearly it is unfortunate that Mr Fidler will have to tear down the property he built, but he already had a home on the site, and planning law doesn't distinguish between one man building a house and developers building 200 houses and everyone has to abide by the same rules. We have to protect our green belt land from development.
"We will be urging the Government to look again at planning law as it should be made clear that the four-year rule should not be invoked if blatant deception has occurred."
The luxury house, which cost £50,000 to build, has two turrets, crenelations and cannons.
Mr Fidler has the right of appeal to the High Court against the decision.
5:02pm Thursday 8th May 2008
Print 
Email this 
CommentPosted by: sue fenton, redhill on 11:32am Thu 15 May 08
This case reminds me of that of Nicholas Van Hoogstraten, the notorious Sussex landowner who deliberately and persistently blocked a public right of way across his land, despite orders from the county council to the contrary. Van Hoogstraten and Fidler both appear to believe that owning land gives you the right to do what you like on it, regardless of the law.
Had Fidler not carried out his deception with such intent and forethought, one might have assumed him to be completely barking mad - the whole carry-on seemed on first reading about it to be a thoroughly loony enterprise. But baying at the moon doesn’t seem to be a let-out in this case. The man set out, with premeditation and cunning, to deceive, knowing full well he would not have been permitted to build his "castle" if he had gone through the proper channels.
I feel sorry for his poor wife and child, who were forced to ensure life in darkness behind those ridiculous hay bales for years.
If Fidler gets away with this on appeal, will it be OK for the rest of us to erect some tasteless monstrosity of a building in our gardens too?
This case reminds me of that of Nicholas Van Hoogstraten, the notorious Sussex landowner who deliberately and persistently blocked a public right of way across his land, despite orders from the county council to the contrary. Van Hoogstraten and Fidler both appear to believe that owning land gives you the right to do what you like on it, regardless of the law.
Had Fidler not carried out his deception with such intent and forethought, one might have assumed him to be completely barking mad - the whole carry-on seemed on first reading about it to be a thoroughly loony enterprise. But baying at the moon doesn’t seem to be a let-out in this case. The man set out, with premeditation and cunning, to deceive, knowing full well he would not have been permitted to build his "castle" if he had gone through the proper channels.
I feel sorry for his poor wife and child, who were forced to ensure life in darkness behind those ridiculous hay bales for years.
If Fidler gets away with this on appeal, will it be OK for the rest of us to erect some tasteless monstrosity of a building in our gardens too?
What are these links for?
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content we've made it easy for you to do it.
At the bottom of all articles, you'll see links to six sites. These sites - commonly called 'social bookmark' or 'social news' sites - have large communities of web users who share and rate interesting, useful and fun things on the web.
Clicking the links will automatically add the address of the story you are reading to one of these sites, letting you share it with others. Each site will ask you to register to share stories. Registration is free and once a member, you can store, recommend and search for stories that interest you.
More on Digg
More on del.icio.us
More on Furl
More on reddit
More on NowPublic/
More on Yahoo!
